| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
This is technically correct (and for illustration):
```py
>>> "asdf"""
'asdf'
>>> "asdf""qwer"
'asdfqwer'
>>> def foo():
... "asdf"""
... return 4
...
>>> foo()
4
>>> foo.__doc__
'asdf'
```
But as it currently exists, it messes up some (admittedly, incorrect)
lexers/syntax highlighters (e.g. emacs's python-mode).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
checking cache
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plugins should trigger the analysis themselves and update their variable objects after
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BinaryView::DefineImportedFunction APIs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
string, and __str__ for functions with the full prototype: Fixes #1549
|
|
|
|
|